Editorial policy
Our aim is to make clear, balanced editorial work about compatibility and dating culture. We separate explanation from certainty, state what a claim can support, and revise pages when a meaningful error is found.
Accuracy and care
Writers should use claims that can be explained and checked, distinguish established definitions from interpretation, and avoid presenting a matching label as a prediction. When a subject is uncertain or depends on individual circumstances, the wording should make that limit visible. We do not invent research, quotations or expertise.
Independence
Editorial choices are guided by reader relevance and clarity. Commercial relationships do not determine our conclusions, and a partner cannot buy favourable editorial coverage or control an independent article.
Corrections
Readers can report a suspected error through the Contact page. We review the claim, correct confirmed mistakes and clarify material changes in the relevant page so readers can understand what changed.
Partner material and illustrations
Paid or partner material is clearly labelled where it appears and kept distinct from independent editorial work. Some illustrations may be generated with AI; where used, they are identified as illustrations and are not presented as documentary evidence.
A match is a starting point, not a measure of worth.
We make space for nuance: people are more than profiles, and compatibility is something to explore together, not a score to obey.